An Introduction to Extended Riverfly
Oct 2024 — Steve Brooks (Riverfly Partnership Co-Chair)
What is it and what is it for?
Extended Riverfly is intended for people who already have a few years’ experience in using RMI. They should already be familiar with the basic eight RMI target groups and have got know many of the other river invertebrate groups. Extended Riverfly is an expansion of the original RMI method that uses 33 invertebrate groups, including the basic eight RMI groups. It includes most of the major groups of macroinvertebrates you are likely to find in your samples and gives more nuanced idea of what is going on in the river than RMI; the river’s quality, possible stressors and its biodiversity. Rather than being a replacement for the monthly RMI sampling, Extended Riverfly is best used on a seasonal (especially spring and autumn) or annual basis to assess, for example, the performance of river restorations or the impacts of outfalls.
How does it work?
The Extended Riverfly sampling method is almost the same as RMI. It uses a 3-minute kick sample but also includes a 30-second surface sweep, to detect surface living insects such as pond skaters, water measurers and water crickets, and the stone search is reduced to 30 seconds. Sorting your sample for Extended Riverfly is likely to add at least an hour to the basic RMI sampling time. Links are available on the Riverfly Partnership website to various Extended Riverfly resources including the identification chart, the scoring system, and John Davy-Bowker’s You Tube video channel showing the sampling method and the invertebrate target groups.
Extended Riverfly includes several invertebrate groups that are tolerant of organic pollution, low flow and siltation. Large numbers of these will reflect the impacts of those stressors. There are four abundance classes, the same as in RMI, but the scoring system gives increasingly negative values to stress-tolerant taxa. Extended Riverfly produces two overall scores: a Water Quality Score (WQS) and a Silt and Flow Score (SFS), but you can also derive an RMI score from your sample too. These are all calculated when you upload your data onto the national Cartographer Riverfly database. There is no Trigger Level based on Extended Riverfly, trigger levels are still calculated from the RMI score.
Training
There is now a national network of qualified Extended Riverfly tutors who can provide training workshops in many areas of the UK. The training is an iterative process, typically comprising two or three sessions of tutored sorting of a sample, collected in a local river, to establish the consistency of potential monitors to identify the catch at different times of year. There is a test at the end of the workshop to identify a selection of 20-30 specimens. A 90% pass mark is required before monitors are signed off to upload data to national database, but everyone is encouraged to keep their own records before that.
What do the scores mean?
There are about 1300 Extended Riverfly records currently available on the National Riverfly Database from across the country. These data show WQS range from 0 to 52 and suggest poor scores are below 15 and scores indicating good water quality are above 35. Similarly, SFS scores below 15 indicate sites badly impacted by low flows and siltation, whereas scores above 40 indicate rivers not badly impacted by siltation or low flows.
Extended Riverfly scores can help to amplify trends in riverfly data. For example, the data below that Simon Stebbings has generated from the River Mimram in Hertfordshire shows a distinct decline in both WQS and SFS in December which is not really apparent in the RMI data.
Also on the River Mimram, at Panshanger, Extended Riverfly was used to investigate the effect of river restoration using pre- (2022) and post-restoration (2023) monitoring. The control site 1, upstream of the restoration, shows a decline in SFS, WQS and RMI scores between 2022 and 2023, whereas within the restoration, at sites 3, 4 and 5, there is an increase in SFS and WQS but only a small increase in RMI scores. This again shows that Extended Riverfly can emphasise trends seen only weakly in RMI. There is a large increase in overall abundance of invertebrates in the restored sites, especially those sensitive to siltation and poor water quality. These results suggest that the restoration, using large woody debris placed in the river channel, has served to speed flow and scour silt from the gravels.
So, if you are interested in getting trained in Extended Riverfly monitoring, please contact Riverfly Partnership HQ at info@riverflies.org.